Jan Ehrhardt in php.pecl.dev (Thu, 20 Nov 2014 03:05:35 +0100):
>Jakub Zelenka in php.pecl.dev (Wed, 19 Nov 2014 13:33:26 +):
>>Forcing all PECL devs to use extra branch is not the right solution IMHO.
>>The best solution would be give devs choice. For example if you don't have
>>'phpng' branch
Jan Ehrhardt in php.pecl.dev (Thu, 20 Nov 2014 03:05:35 +0100):
>Jakub Zelenka in php.pecl.dev (Wed, 19 Nov 2014 13:33:26 +):
>>Forcing all PECL devs to use extra branch is not the right solution IMHO.
>>The best solution would be give devs choice. For example if you don't have
>>'phpng' branch
Jakub Zelenka in php.pecl.dev (Wed, 19 Nov 2014 13:33:26 +):
>Forcing all PECL devs to use extra branch is not the right solution IMHO.
>The best solution would be give devs choice. For example if you don't have
>'phpng' branch then try to compile master.
This was my idea too. Do not force a P
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 12:50 PM, Michael Wallner wrote:
>
> I don't think this is a viable option. PHP/Zend internals dialect is
> complicated enough even without another (compat) layer. Changes in PHP7
> are just to many to make the code still look sane with all the #ifdefs,
> and often enough,
On 19/11/14 12:00, Jakub Zelenka wrote:
> Hi,
>
> BTW: if all extension maintainers use the same naming convention ('phpng
>> branch') it would make things somewhat easier.
>>
>
> I don't think that all maintainers will need two branches for that. At
> least I don't want to have two branches and
From the Jan E. perspective, one convention is big advantage, because
he maintains very useful packaged actual builds for tons of extensions
across different php branches.
- http://www.apachelounge.com/viewtopic.php?t=6123
It doesn't matter if the convetion will be based on special branch or
c
Hi,
BTW: if all extension maintainers use the same naming convention ('phpng
> branch') it would make things somewhat easier.
>
I don't think that all maintainers will need two branches for that. At
least I don't want to have two branches and maintain the extension twice
:). For that reason I sta
