Peirce in this area reminds me of Benedict Ashley’s argument (in How Science
Enriches Theology [2012], Chap. 1, p. 17):
“The fundamental particles from which all bodies are composed are in constant
motion, and physicists strive to find the source of their energy. Today this is
traced to the
I am sure there are people here who can substantiate a more balanced
defense of my notion than I can. Everything I have done since
encountering CSP has been based on my understanding. Even if it was in
error I would still be grateful for the fund of insight that has let me to
my own articulation
Gary F., Stephen, all,
The full text of Peirce's letter of April 24, 1892 to the Reverend John
W. Brown is at
http://www.unav.es/gep/LetterJBrown.html
at the website of the Grupo de Estudios Peirceanos. G.E.P. also has
images of the letter, beginning at:
http://www.unav.es/gep/1Brown.html
Dear Gary and list
Peirce seems keen to work with the foundation of all religions, which is one
way to characterize the pure types of mysticism and the theory of collecting
them into a perennial philosophy. His theory of the immanent divine as
Firstness and his idea of an emptiness before
Dear Gary and list
Your quote made me think of John of the Cross famous poem of the dark night
describing the mystical union. http://www.ewtn.com/library/SOURCES/DARK-JC.TXT
. I have italicized the places where the a-personal in the union is described
though the poem is within the frames of
Sorry, It was Ben who found the quote about walking in the garden.
Søren
Fra: Benjamin Udell [mailto:bud...@nyc.rr.com]
Sendt: 21. maj 2014 20:18
Til: peirce-l@list.iupui.edu
Emne: Re: [PEIRCE-L] De Waal seminar chapter 9, section on God, science and
religion: text 1
Quick
Dear Jon, List,
Thank you, I will look at NEM 4. My way of approach is not accurate, I admit. I like the term object domain. Phyllis has showed me, that in my example the object domain consists of three sub-objects (this is my interpretation), that form a categorial triad with each other. I
Søren, Ben, list,
I don’t want to downplay the affinities between Peirce and the mystics you
mention, Søren — your previous post was quite eloquent and persuasive — but I
don’t want to downplay the differences either. Peirce’s religious orientation
is, as Anderson says in Strands of System,
Soren:
Forgive my intrusion and brevity. This is a beatiful message. In
Spanish we would say: muy hermoso.
Eduardo Forastieri-Braschi
-Original Message-
From: Søren Brier [sb@cbs.dk]
Sent: 5/21/2014 2:11:56 PM
To: g...@gnusystems.ca;Peirce-L@list.iupui.edu
Post : Peirce's 1870 “Logic Of Relatives” • Comment 11.16
http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2014/05/21/peirces-1870-logic-of-relatives-%e2%80%a2-comment-11-16/
Posted : May 21, 2014 at 4:00 pm
Author : Jon Awbrey
Peircers,
We have enough material on morphisms now to go back and cast a more
Dear Eduardo
Thank you. I have been fascinated by it since I discovered this connection.
Which made me study some necessary works of the traditions.
Isayeva N. (1993). Shankara and Indian philosophy. Delhi: Sri Satguru
Publications.
John of the Cross. (2003). Dark night of the soul, New
Mysticism in the case of Peirce and many others does not refer to an
ongoing designation but to a particular experience or experiences that
convince one that she/he is part of a unity. It is a life-changing
experiene but it has little to do with ones religious or theological
formulations save that
12 matches
Mail list logo