Dear Koichiro, list -
I am not sure I follow your argument. When I speak about natural Dicisigns, I
take them to presuppose organisms. So I do not think Schrödinger
indistinguishability precludes them.
Best
F
Den 05/09/2014 kl. 04.10 skrev Koichiro Matsuno
Dear Edwina, list -
I think Edwina is right here. It is no argument against pan- or physiosemiotics
to say that physics should be processes of pure secondness. If such processes
exist, they would indeed be completely random and follow no laws - as all laws,
due to their generality, are
Dear Jeff, lists
Thank you for good questions.
The gneralization that Jeff sums up in two points indeed forms my starting
point (and was considered in the Diagrammatology book of 2007).
Here, it is taken as the premiss to the vaster generalization that
logic/semiotics is independent of any
Dear Stephen, Clark -
I see your point. I regret there is not an e-book version available.
But the paper version is pretty cheap - around $15.
Best
F
Den 05/09/2014 kl. 18.29 skrev Clark Goble
cl...@lextek.commailto:cl...@lextek.com:
On Sep 5, 2014, at 10:19 AM, Stephen C. Rose
Dear John, list
I don't think Peirce disagrees that thinking is necessarily psychological.
I think he does. From the 1860s to the 1910s he claims logic and the study of
thought are not part of psychology.
He thought that we can't get outside of the signs in the head via thinking
processes
How is the crater is an index of the meteor superfluous for understanding the
crater?
From: Frederik Stjernfelt [mailto:stj...@hum.ku.dk]
Sent: Sunday, September 07, 2014 8:47
To: biosemiot...@lists.ut.ee; Peirce List
Subject: [biosemiotics:6685] Re: Natural Propositions:
Dear Stan -
Good luck!
Gary Richmond
Philosophy and Critical Thinking
Communication Studies
LaGuardia College of the City University of New York
C 745
718 482-5690
*** *** *** ***---BeginMessage---
Heidegger's Black Notebooks: A Conference
Heideggers Black Notebooks, recently published in Germany, were intended as
