RE: [PEIRCE-L] Re: Abduction, Deduction, Induction : Analogy, Inquiry

2016-03-09 Thread John Collier
I am not at all clear what you are getting at here, Jerry. I thought Jon Awbrey’s recent remarks 1 and 2 were spot on. On his reference to 3, creativity, I would follow the approach I give for creativity in language, but restricted to the formation of hypotheses, in * Informal Pragmatics

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Re: Abduction, Deduction, Induction : Analogy, Inquiry

2016-03-09 Thread Jerry Rhee
Wrt Jerry C's contribution... Why *eros* and not *epithumia*? Wherefore relevance relation? "My point is not that Strauss is wrong, but that he owes us an account of how the Socratic path between Scylla and Charybdis can be maintained without shipwreck." ~ Stanley Rosen. The question really

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Re: Abduction, Deduction, Induction : Analogy, Inquiry

2016-03-09 Thread Jerry LR Chandler
John, Clark, List: > On Mar 9, 2016, at 1:59 AM, John Collier wrote: > > List, <> > > Another point that is often overlooked in discussions of inference to the > best explanation, which I agree is not the same as abduction, though I think > abduction is more

[PEIRCE-L] Re: Abduction, Deduction, Induction : Analogy, Inquiry

2016-03-09 Thread Jon Awbrey
Recently: CG:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/18475 JA:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/18476 JC:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/18483 JR:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/18484 List, As far

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Re: Abduction, Deduction, Induction : Analogy, Inquiry

2016-03-09 Thread Jerry Rhee
Hi all, It seems paradoxical to me that a Peircean doesn't believe in Peirce's method to inferencing truth under uncertainty. There must be a way out of this dilemma...one, two, three...CP 5.189. Best, Jerry R On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 1:59 AM, John Collier wrote: > List, >

RE: [PEIRCE-L] Re: Abduction, Deduction, Induction : Analogy, Inquiry

2016-03-09 Thread John Collier
List, Another point that is often overlooked in discussions of inference to the best explanation, which I agree is not the same as abduction, though I think abduction is more restrictive than just inference to any hypothesis from which the evidence might be inferred, is that the best