List,

Another point that is often overlooked in discussions of inference to the best 
explanation, which I agree is not the same as abduction, though I think 
abduction is more restrictive than just inference to any hypothesis from which 
the evidence might be inferred, is that the best explanation need not be a good 
explanation, so we need more than inference to the best explanation to carry 
out inquiry responsibly. There are no magic rules for finding the truth (or 
“anything goes” as Feyerabend would say in his typically provocative manner).

John Collier
Professor Emeritus and Senior Research Associate
University of KwaZulu-Natal
http://web.ncf.ca/collier

From: Clark Goble [mailto:cl...@lextek.com]
Sent: Friday, 04 March 2016 12:35 AM
To: Peirce List
Subject: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Re: Abduction, Deduction, Induction : Analogy, Inquiry


On Mar 3, 2016, at 3:25 PM, Jon Awbrey 
<jawb...@att.net<mailto:jawb...@att.net>> wrote:

Let me just say again that abduction is not “inference to the best explanation”.
That gloss derives from a later attempt to rationalize Peirce's idea and it has
led to a whole literature of misconception.  Abduction is more like “inference
to any explanation” — or maybe adapting Kant's phrase, “conceiving a concept
that reduces a manifold to a unity”.  The most difficult part of its labor
is delivering a term, very often new or unnoticed, that can serve as
a middle term in grasping the structure of an object domain.

I fully agree and many of his quotations make clear it’s not inference to the 
best explanation. However we should admit that in some places he sure seems to 
get close to that idea. Even if it doesn’t appear to be workable. I’d argue 
that even when he appears to be talking about best explanation he’s much more 
after the fact our guesses are so often quite good. (Although I’d have to go 
through all the quotes to be sure that’s fair to the texts)


-----------------------------
PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L 
to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iupui.edu . To 
UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to l...@list.iupui.edu with the 
line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at 
http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .




Reply via email to