RE: [PEIRCE-L] The auhor's claim: There is no *distinctly* scientific method

2016-07-14 Thread sb
Gary F., maybe i misread your original post. I was triggered by "and historically, there’s a lot of truth to that". Knee jerk reaction pushing an already open door... Best Stefan Am 14. Juli 2016 15:47:42 MESZ, schrieb g...@gnusystems.ca: >Stefan, I would concur with everything you say

RE: [PEIRCE-L] The auhor's claim: There is no *distinctly* scientific method

2016-07-14 Thread gnox
Stefan, I would concur with everything you say here. “Revolt against authority” as a founding myth of “modern science” is, to me, not a hypothesis but an oversimplified story (all stories are simplified to some degree). One can find traces of it in, for example, the “Cosmos” television series,

RE: [PEIRCE-L] The auhor's claim: There is no *distinctly* scientific method

2016-07-14 Thread sb
Gary F., yes i agree, Peirce reading of the history of science is based on the idea that we are standing on shoulders of giants. But i doubt the revolt against authority hypothesis. Take for example Galileo, he never revolted against the church. He was deeply rooted in the tradition of