Aw: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Pragmatic Theory Of Truth

Dear List Members, I think, that the Peircean truth is the similarity between the immediate and the dynamical object, achieved in the infinite future, and this similarity will be perfect (after indefinite time), when the only aspect, that tells it (the similarity) from sameness, is, that the

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Re: Super-Order and the Logic of Continuity (was Metaphysics and Nothing (was Peirce's Cosmology))

Jeff: Parallelograms of forces about interacting electrical charges require a spherical mode of description. Correspondingly, an explanation of spherical forces requires categorial illations. Can the diagram be extended to spheres? Cheers Jerry > On Mar 17, 2017, at 10:19 AM, Jeffrey Brian

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Pragmatic Theory Of Truth

John, List > On Mar 16, 2017, at 1:49 PM, John F Sowa wrote: > > But if we use some language with a finite alphabet and limit > the theories to a finite specification, there are at most > a countable number of theories. > > But there are two ways for a theory expressed in

[PEIRCE-L] Re: Pragmatic Theory Of Truth

Re: CG:https://list.iupui.edu/sympa/arc/peirce-l/2017-03/msg00012.html CG:https://list.iupui.edu/sympa/arc/peirce-l/2017-03/msg00111.html Clark, I've been trying to get back to the questions you raised on your initial “Truth as Regulative or Real” thread and again on this one, but there are a