Re: CG:https://list.iupui.edu/sympa/arc/peirce-l/2017-03/msg00012.html CG:https://list.iupui.edu/sympa/arc/peirce-l/2017-03/msg00111.html
Clark, I've been trying to get back to the questions you raised on your initial “Truth as Regulative or Real” thread and again on this one, but there are a number of underlying issues that require a measure of preparation on my part. I've made scattered remarks on these issues many times over the last couple of decades, without quite sensing much success in making them clear, so I'm going to do my best to put together a more coherent account this time around. Until then ... Jon On 3/13/2017 6:51 PM, CLARK GOBLE wrote:
On Mar 13, 2017, at 7:00 AM, Jon Awbrey <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: I think John Sowa's remarks about the “major failures caused by ignoring [Peirce]” and Jerry Chandler's remarks about later readings serving as a “Procrustian bed for CSP's concepts” are very apt in this context, and I will have more to say in that regard if I can get to it.I think so too, but I think we should make explicit what other doctrines Peirce held that was different from the mainstream of philosophy lead to these differences. Off the top of my head I think you have to mention the following: scholastic realism vs. nominalism modal realism vs. actualism (primarily for the late Peirce although with the pragmatic maxim he moved to counterfactuals reasonably early) externalism vs. internalism signs vs. thoughts in a mind (i.e. the interpretant need not be a human mind) verification as meaning vs. verification as truth There’s probably some others but those five see the key differences that make terms like correspondence or coherence misleading at best.
-- inquiry into inquiry: https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/ academia: https://independent.academia.edu/JonAwbrey oeiswiki: https://www.oeis.org/wiki/User:Jon_Awbrey isw: http://intersci.ss.uci.edu/wiki/index.php/JLA facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/JonnyCache
----------------------------- PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] with the line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
