Gary F., List:
Thanks for your comments. I am indeed eager to recognize and explore
the *evolution
*of Peirce's thought over the course of his life as reflected in his
manuscripts, which is why I always provide the year of publication or
composition whenever I cite or quote him, and I encourage
Gary F, Edwina, Jon AS, List,
I am delighted to read about GF's
applications of Peirce's writings to the issues that Edwina copied:
"the continuity between the processes of semiosis and those of
life
itself" and "the recursive and nonlinear nature of
those processes".
In 2006, I wrote an
Gary F:
I was rather astonished to read your comments that you were
interested in both
"the continuity between the processes of semiosis and those of life
itself" and "the recursive and nonlinear nature of those processes";
and
" such real-world
Jon A.S. (and list),
That is a very interesting discovery, and I look forward to your complete
transcription of R 787. It occurs to me that much of your recent contribution
to the list and to Peircean scholarship has been to restore the integrity of
Peirce’s manuscripts, which (as the late
Jon Alan, List
Thank you Jon Alan. Your post shows us the good side of your "radical"
literalism . It also highlights how the Collected papers which play a very
great role to publicize Peirce was fundamental but they also introduced
great difficulties that the chronological edition will resolve
Gary F.
You wrote a curious response, stating that I appropriate a technical term to
evoke a broader concept of commons.
For the record: I did introduce the history of the term culture in the social
sciences in order to show that in his days it was wanting (Bildung in Germany
and civil
