Re: [PEIRCE-L] Peirce's contributions to the 21st century

2021-10-10 Thread Gary Richmond
Edwina, John, List ET: First - I don't believe that anyone - whether in the 'pure philosophy' field or the applied fields can ever say: 'OK, I now sufficiently and thoroughly understand Peirce's contributions' . Someone, either oneself or some one else - will have more to say. I agree with you

[PEIRCE-L] Peirce's contributions to the 21st century

2021-10-10 Thread Edwina Taborsky
BODY { font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12px; }Gary R, List I won't speak for John but only myself. I'm a bit confused by your post. First - I don't believe that anyone - whether in the 'pure philosophy' field or the applied fields can ever say:

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Peirce's contributions to the 21st century (was Dimensionality

2021-10-10 Thread Gary Richmond
John, List, John, do you really believe that most everyone -- or even many a one -- now working in linguistics, cognitive science, and AI sufficiently, let alone, thoroughly understands Peirce's contributions to philosophy, semeiotic and a number of relevant sciences and so they are now fully

Re: [PEIRCE-L] [EXTERNAL] Peirce on Dimensionality (was Connected Signs Theorem)

2021-10-10 Thread Jon Alan Schmidt
Helmut, List: >From a topological standpoint, any line figure is one-dimensional regardless of whether it is straight or curved, and any surface is two-dimensional regardless of whether it is flat or undulating. At any arbitrarily marked point on a line figure, only a hypothetical particle moving

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Peirce's contributions to the 21st century (was Dimensionality

2021-10-10 Thread Edwina Taborsky
BODY { font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12px; }List I obviously completely agree. A vital issue in Peircean studies is- what do his ideas mean for us today? Quite frankly, to confine Peircean studies to textual analysis, terms, etc has its uses, but, it

[PEIRCE-L] Peirce's contributions to the 21st century (was Dimensionality

2021-10-10 Thread sowa @bestweb.net
I accidentally hit SEND on my previous reply. I won't criticize anybody's attempts to determine exactly what Peirce intended a century ago/ But a far more important issue is what his ideas mean for us today. A few years ago, I wrote a widely cited n article with the title "Peirce's

Re: [PEIRCE-L] [EXTERNAL] Peirce on Dimensionality (was ConnectedSigns Theorem)

2021-10-10 Thread sowa @bestweb.net
From: "Jon Alan Schmidt" Sent: Saturday, October 9, 2021 5:09 PM To: "Peirce-L" Subject: Re: [PEIRCE-L] [EXTERNAL] Peirce on Dimensionality (was ConnectedSigns Theorem) Jack, List: I can offer a couple more thoughts related to

Re: [PEIRCE-L] C.S. Peirce • Algebra of Logic ∫ Philosophy of Notation

2021-10-10 Thread Jon Awbrey
Cf: C.S. Peirce • Algebra of Logic ∫ Philosophy of Notation • 2 http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2021/10/10/c-s-peirce-algebra-of-logic-%e2%88%ab-philosophy-of-notation-2/ All, Continuing the previous passage in preparation for discussing the iconic, indexical, and symbolic aspects of Peirce's

Aw: [PEIRCE-L] [EXTERNAL] Peirce on Dimensionality (was Connected Signs Theorem)

2021-10-10 Thread Helmut Raulien
Jon, List,   I think, the dimensionality of a line or of a surface is only then integer (1 or 2), if the line is straight, or the surface is even. Otherwise, the dimensionality of the line is between 1 and 2, or of the surface it is between 2 and 3.   Best, Helmut      09. Oktober 2021 um