Jon, list,
I would tend to agree with your conclusion.
JAS: [It] seems to me that a Quasi-mind can be defined as an *individual *Sign
that is also a *complex *of Signs, which are connected such that they are
susceptible to determination by *another *Sign to a *single *Interpretant.
The
List:
Per Gary R.'s suggestion, I set aside the concept of "perfect Sign" for a
little while to focus on the concept of "Quasi-mind." After going back
through the key quotes (https://list.iupui.edu/sympa/
arc/peirce-l/2018-02/msg00322.html), all of which are from 1906, here is a
revised summary.
