List,
It behooves us to stop accusing people of being literalists as if it is
*their* problem that they are literalists.
Today, there is a wind blowing through the Academy demanding that all of us
become literalists when we encounter digital models of the human mind,
creating an unhealthy
Claudio - I am equal to anyone else, and therefore, am as 'equipped'
[whatever does that mean?] to handle further exploration of Peirce's
work in the 21st century. What I expect from the List is that when I
post something that does such exploration, I would be met with: 'Yes,
that's an
List,
Of course, we are post-Peirceans! How could we be pre-Peirceans or even
just Peirceans...!!!
this pretentious behavior, the gratuitous aggression and the silence of
others is the reason way I left writing to the List some years ago
"Some *'literalists' *think we should leave the forest as
Le 17/10/2021 à 16:11, Robert Marty a écrit :
Cher Bernard, vous écrivez :
"I think that the content and purpose of Phaneroscopy needs to be
cleared up independently of the question of classification of sciences.
On the contrary what has been suggested is to find a place for an
unknown thing
Cher Bernard, vous écrivez :
"I think that the content and purpose of Phaneroscopy needs to be cleared
up independently of the question of classification of sciences.
On the contrary what has been suggested is to find a place for an unknown
thing into a pretty trichotomy a priori derived from the
John, List,
Le 16/10/2021 à 23:58, sowa @bestweb.net a écrit :
I agree with ET. Most of the complaints seem to be generated by three
people (GF, GR, and JAS) who object to people who introduce topics for
which they have no canned answer. An example is my note about
phaneroscopy as a
} Truth is truth, whether it is opposed to the interests of society to
>> admit it or not. [Peirce, CP 8.143, EP2:61] {
>>
>> https://gnusystems.ca/wp/ }{ living the time
>>
>>
>>
>> From: peirce-l-requ...@list.iupui.edu On Behalf Of Margaretha Hendrickx
>&
John, Margaretha, Gary F, Edwina, Jon A S, List,
I am in the process of exploring the future direction of Peirce-L with
Nathan Houser, who heads The Peirce Group (TPG), and Peter Skagestaad, a
member of TPG who was charged with overseeing the functioning of Peirce-L
when over a decade ago I was
John, List:
JFS: Most of the complaints seem to be generated by three people (GF, GR,
and JAS) who object to people who introduce topics for which they have no
canned answer.
Like Gary F., I cannot recall a single instance when one of us objected to
the introduction of any particular *topic*.
Margaretha Hendrickx
Cc: Peirce-L ; g...@gnusystems.ca
Subject: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Should we start a new email list?
Margartha, Gary F, Ediwna, Jerry R, List,
Before saying anything else, I'll repeat my previous remark: "both and",
not "either or". I would not drop my s
Margartha, Gary F, Ediwna, Jerry R, List,
Before saying anything else, I'll repeat my previous remark: "both and", not
"either or". I would not drop my subscription to Peirce-L, but I hope to
discuss topics about Cognitive Science, which do not seem to be welcome on this
list. For an
f.
} Truth is truth, whether it is opposed to the interests of society to admit it or not. [Peirce, CP 8.143, EP2:61] {
https://gnusystems.ca/wp/ }{ living the time
From: peirce-l-requ...@list.iupui.edu On Behalf Of Margaretha Hendrickx
Sent: 16-Oct-21 11:22
To: s...@bestweb.net
Cc: Peirce-L
S
] {
https://gnusystems.ca/wp/ [3] }{ living the time
From: peirce-l-requ...@list.iupui.edu On Behalf Of Margaretha
Hendrickx
Sent: 16-Oct-21 11:22
To: s...@bestweb.net
Cc: Peirce-L
Subject: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Should we start a new email list (was
Peirce's contributions to the 21st c
e more to their liking. At least we (subscribers to peirce-l) wouldn’t
>> have to read all those complaints any more.
>>
>>
>>
>> Gary f.
>>
>>
>>
>> } Truth is truth, whether it is opposed to the interests of society to
>> admit it or not. [Peirce, CP 8
/ [3] }{ living the time
From: peirce-l-requ...@list.iupui.edu [4] On Behalf Of Margaretha
Hendrickx
Sent: 16-Oct-21 11:22
To: s...@bestweb.net [5]
Cc: Peirce-L
Subject: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Should we start a new email list (was
Peirce's contributions to the 21st c
List,
I
> https://gnusystems.ca/wp/ }{ living the time
>
>
>
> From: peirce-l-requ...@list.iupui.edu On Behalf Of Margaretha Hendrickx
> Sent: 16-Oct-21 11:22
> To: s...@bestweb.net
> Cc: Peirce-L
> Subject: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Should we start a new email list (was Peirce's
>
8.143, EP2:61] {
https://gnusystems.ca/wp/ [1] }{ living the time
From: peirce-l-requ...@list.iupui.edu
On Behalf Of Margaretha Hendrickx
Sent: 16-Oct-21 11:22
To: s...@bestweb.net
Cc: Peirce-L
Subject: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Should we start a new email list (was
Peirce's
eb.net
Cc: Peirce-L
Subject: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Should we start a new email list (was Peirce's
contributions to the 21st c
List,
I think it is absurd to start a separate mailing list.
Especially since its purpose would be to use Peirce's work as a mirror to see
what is going on in society
Dear Margaretha, John, Edwina, list,
I concur about the absurdity of beginning a separate list and very much
appreciate the manner in which you have put it.
As for Popper and Peirce, warnings are everywhere.
Proceeding with good judgment about them is harder to find.
With best wishes,
Jerry
List,
I think it is absurd to start a separate mailing list.
Especially since its purpose would be to use Peirce's work as a mirror to
see what is going on in society today.
If people feel perturbed or unvalidated after reading the emails
distributed by this list, well, have you ever had a
List,
On Thursday, I sent the note below to Peirce-L. I received some strong
positive comments and suggestions offline, but complete silence from the
people who send most of the notes to Peirce-L.For example: "As for the
natural extensions of Peirce's thought, even when they agree
21 matches
Mail list logo
