Re: [PEIRCE-L] Systems Of Interpretation - Contrasting the diagrams of ammonia and the handedness of carbon compounds.

Jerry R: The conversation you purpose is of little interest to me. Cheers Jerry > On Apr 8, 2016, at 7:09 PM, Jerry Rhee wrote: > > Jerry C, > > > I’d like to constrain my conversation in light of Peirce’s system of logic, > which is summarized in his formal

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Systems Of Interpretation - Contrasting the diagrams of ammonia and the handedness of carbon compounds.

Jerry C, I’d like to constrain my conversation in light of Peirce’s system of logic, which is summarized in his formal expression of abduction (CP 5.189). Given: C = the surface of things, the comprehensive, the breadth of the matter (CP 4.543) A = the heart of things, the precise, the

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Systems Of Interpretation - Contrasting the diagrams of ammonia and the handedness of carbon compounds.

Jerry R., List: You wrote: >> Just a friendly public service announcement: >> >> >> If your interest is in genotype/phenotype mapping (i.e., relation between >> mutation and change in organism), talk of atoms, molecules and valences is >> considered bizarre. >> >> > On Apr 8, 2016, at

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Systems Of Interpretation - Contrasting the diagrams of ammonia and the handedness of carbon compounds.

Hi Jerry C, I knew I shouldn’t have opened my big mouth… I don’t want to extend this conversation because as I understand the matter, the only good of comparing the structure of ammonia with triadicity is to show that it’s a bad comparison; that they are different and one should NOT compare

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Systems Of Interpretation - Contrasting the diagrams of ammonia and the handedness of carbon compounds.

jerry: I do not understand your post. Can you clarify your meaning? Hopefully in terms of of syllogisms or propositional functions or numeric relations. Nevertheless I agree with with you our assertion that : > Even talking of mutations in individual genes and consequences on phenotype > is

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Systems Of Interpretation - Contrasting the diagrams of ammonia and the handedness of carbon compounds.

Hi all, Just a friendly public service announcement: If your interest is in genotype/phenotype mapping (i.e., relation between mutation and change in organism), talk of atoms, molecules and valences is considered bizarre. I say this as a biologist and because talk of such things is

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Systems Of Interpretation - Contrasting the diagrams of ammonia and the handedness of carbon compounds.

List, Kirsti: > On Apr 7, 2016, at 3:15 AM, kirst...@saunalahti.fi > wrote: > > But let me first ask you some questions, to help me formulate my answer. > > 1) You concentrate on chemical symbols. - How about chemical reactions? JLRC: My interest for several

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Systems Of Interpretation - Contrasting the diagrams of ammonia and the handedness of carbon compounds.

Hi Jerry, list Just a quick resoponse, for now: "Most modern logicians operate off of first order logical premise which roughly translate that logic is an algebra and algebra is a logic. Universality of meaning is, somehow or other, exchanged between algebraic symbols (signs) and logical

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Systems Of Interpretation - Contrasting the diagrams of ammonia and the handedness of carbon compounds.

Hi Kirsti, Clark: From the exchange: >> Mathematical dimensionality, in its traditional form bridges plane and >> solid geometry - 1,2,3,..,N. >> Did CSP ever use traditional mathematical dimensionality in describing >> logic? > No, CSP did not use traditional mathematical divisions into plane

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Systems Of Interpretation - Contrasting the diagrams of ammonia and the handedness of carbon compounds.

Hi Kirsti, Clark: From the exchange: >> Mathematical dimensionality, in its traditional form bridges plane and >> solid geometry - 1,2,3,..,N. >> Did CSP ever use traditional mathematical dimensionality in describing >> logic? > No, CSP did not use traditional mathematical divisions into plane

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Systems Of Interpretation - Contrasting the diagrams of ammonia and the handedness of carbon compounds.

> On Apr 5, 2016, at 9:13 AM, Jerry LR Chandler > wrote: > > Approximations from both quantum theory and molecular mechanics suggest a > ‘flattened” TETRAHEDRAL structure, not a plane. In gas phase, the spectra > data suggests that NH3 molecule flips back and