Jerry R., List: You wrote:
>> Just a friendly public service announcement: >> >> >> If your interest is in genotype/phenotype mapping (i.e., relation between >> mutation and change in organism), talk of atoms, molecules and valences is >> considered bizarre. >> >> > On Apr 8, 2016, at 12:41 AM, Jerry Rhee <[email protected]> wrote: > > I don’t want to extend this conversation because as I understand the matter, > the only good of comparing the structure of ammonia with triadicity is to > show that it’s a bad comparison; that they are different and one should NOT > compare them. > The meaning of your messages is increasingly confusing. What is it that you find bizarre? Do you find the notion of hydrogen-bonding between DNA strands “bizarre”? Do you find the handedness of molecules “bizarre”? What connotations motivate >> Just a friendly public service announcement:?? >> Are you deeply concerned with the ethics of comparisons? Why should one not a comparison, as Roberts did? Please express your premises / conclusion with more clarity. Cheers Jerry
----------------------------- PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] with the line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
