semiosis.
gary f.
From: Howard Pattee [mailto:hpat...@roadrunner.com]
Sent: 6-Sep-14 8:59 PM
To: biosemiot...@lists.ut.ee; 'Peirce List'
Subject: RE: [biosemiotics:6635] Re: [PEIRCE-L] Natural Propositions
Pattees comments on NP Chapters 1 and 2.
At 04:36 PM 9/3/2014, Fred
Pattees comments on NP Chapters 1 and 2.
At 04:36 PM 9/3/2014, Frederik wrote:
FS: Charting how brains or psyches implement
aspects of that chain [of reasoning], however
important this is, does not change the importance
of P's insistence that logic in the broad sense
should be studied indepe
Dear Lists,
I'm happy to see that John Deely altered the subject line of his post, but
John, I wish you'd taken "Natural Propositions" out of it completely. And
the same goes for all the subject lines of the blizzard of posts yesterday
none of which made any reference to the actual content of C
In reply to Howard- see my comments:
At 04:47 PM 9/3/2014, Frederik wrote:
Adding semiotic concepts to your description of physical events can be
done, but it does not really add to our understanding of them - while in our
understanding of biological events, semiotic concepts are alway