Aw: [PEIRCE-L] [EXTERNAL] Objects and Perception (was God and the Universe (was The Thing In Itself))

2023-06-12 Thread Helmut Raulien
      Supplement: How can you represent the absence of representation? You can, by calling it "nothing". But that cannot be true. So it is possible to represent something that isn´t there, that is a falsity. So you cannot believe in representation. So you cannot prove anything by showing how or

Aw: [PEIRCE-L] [EXTERNAL] Objects and Perception (was God and the Universe (was The Thing In Itself))

2023-06-12 Thread Helmut Raulien
Jack, list,   I am not the one able to forgive you using the term "silicon valley idiots", because I cannot see any unjustifiedness of this term. I am happy, that you are so clearly opposed against my fear, which is caused initially by buddhism, and amplified by Hollywood blockbuster, er, -ism.

Aw: [PEIRCE-L] [EXTERNAL] Objects and Perception (was God and the Universe (was The Thing In Itself))

2023-06-11 Thread Helmut Raulien
  Jack, list,   A proof must resist all "If"s. Can it resist the following, quite weird "If"? There are evolution experiments with computers. Program parts with the ability to interact and to learn are implemented in a virtual, let´s say, matrix. If these program parts would develop an