Aw: Re: Re: RE: [PEIRCE-L] Peirce's Way of Thinking (was Theory and Analysis of Semeiosis)

2020-06-10 Thread Helmut Raulien
      Supplement: The relation between the DO and the sign is, that the sign denotes the DO, and the DO dertermines the sign. Apart from a true index, the DO determines the sign indirectly, by a bypass, via the shared memory of the commens. You are debating, whether this commens is a fusion

Aw: Re: Re: RE: [PEIRCE-L] Peirce's Way of Thinking (was Theory and Analysis of Semeiosis)

2020-06-10 Thread Helmut Raulien
Robert, List,   yes, your post answers a lot of questions I had in the post I wrote that appeared after yours, but I had written before I had read yours. Thank you! I had felt, that representation is something quite different from event, two different ways of looking at a sign, but it is a

Aw: Re: Re: RE: [PEIRCE-L] Peirce's Way of Thinking (was Theory and Analysis of Semeiosis)

2020-06-09 Thread Helmut Raulien
Edwina, List,   you wrote:  "Think of semiosis not as a mechanical action but as a process of the actual generation of information". But information is a mechanical process. There is no habit without a memory, and a memory is a solid state apparatus, or a quasi-solid equilibrial attractor like