Robert, I can see how your Categorical Theoretic Structuralism is a way of
establishing the credentials of phaneroscopy as a science. But it doesn’t
explain why Peirce’s classification places it first among all positive
sciences, prior to logic and semiotic. Almost any positive science can call
on
List,
My aim is not to differ from André's approach to discovering categories. I
do not want to engage in an endless philosophical debate about the reality
of mathematical objects and their complex relationship with experience. The
disagreements will come later because I assume a Categorical
List,
Robert, except for a few inaccuracies (like the misspelling of prescission),
your account of the discovery of the categories is very much in line with
André’s, although the terminology is different. If I may focus on one sentence
of your summary, I have a question about your usage of the
