ation.
>>
>>
>>
>> Best
>>
>> Frederik
>>
>>
>>
>> *From: *"g...@gnusystems.ca" <g...@gnusystems.ca>
>> *Reply-To: *"g...@gnusystems.ca" <g...@gnusystems.ca>
>> *Date: *Sunday 3 September 2
lt;g...@gnusystems.ca>
> *Reply-To: *"g...@gnusystems.ca" <g...@gnusystems.ca>
> *Date: *Sunday 3 September 2017 at 15:26
> *To: *'Peirce-L' <peirce-l@list.iupui.edu>
> *Subject: *RE: [PEIRCE-L] Deduction, induction, abduction, categories
>
>
>
>
mber 2017 at 15:26
To: 'Peirce-L' <peirce-l@list.iupui.edu>
Subject: RE: [PEIRCE-L] Deduction, induction, abduction, categories
Helmut, you wrote
“Deduction has one mode: True. Induction has two modes: true and false.
Abduction has three modes: True, false, and nonsentic.”
Actuall
Helmut, you wrote
“Deduction has one mode: True. Induction has two modes: true and false.
Abduction has three modes: True, false, and nonsentic.”
Actually all of these “modes” belong properly to deduction, or “necessary
reasoning,” where a proposition is either true or false; as for absurdity,
Hi Helmut,
I have argued your point before on this list, but others on
the list pointed me to solid references for viewing abduction as
a Firstness. But I still see much where "surprising facts" cause
us to question our world view, definitely something
