Helmut, list,
The analogy is:
object - source
sign (or representamen) - encoding
interpretant - decoding
recognizant - destination.
I haven't discussed it in any detail at peirce-l in many years, and
whatever I've written on it at my websites is rather old. So I'm not
eager to launch into a
Ben, list,
"Recognizant" is a good term, I think. Recognizant and interpretant, like source and destination too, describe a continuity, which is a trait of thirdness. Maybe another example of fourism is Talcott Parsons AGIL- scheme, the four necessities of an acting system, esp. a social one:
lli...@ukzn.ac.za>
Cc: g...@gnusystems.ca; 'Peirce-L' <peirce-l@list.iupui.edu>
Subject: Aw: RE: RE: [PEIRCE-L] Re: 6 vectors and 3 inference patterns
John,
that is interesting to me, as I did not know, that reverse engineering is
merely about the result or function, but not about the cod
gnusystems.ca
Cc: 'Peirce-L' <peirce-l@list.iupui.edu>
Subject: Aw: RE: [PEIRCE-L] Re: 6 vectors and 3 inference patterns
List,
when I read about the comparison of science / mathematics with engineering, the term "reverse-engineering" comes into my mind. Perhaps a hyp
edu>
Subject: Aw: RE: [PEIRCE-L] Re: 6 vectors and 3 inference patterns
List,
when I read about the comparison of science / mathematics with engineering, the
term "reverse-engineering" comes into my mind. Perhaps a hypothesis in physics
is an attempt to reverse-engineer an
