Re: [PEIRCE-L] [EXTERNAL] RE: André De Tienne: Slow Read slide 8

2021-06-30 Thread JACK ROBERT KELLY CODY
' views. Best Jack From: Helmut Raulien Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2021 10:20 PM To: JACK ROBERT KELLY CODY Cc: Jon Alan Schmidt ; peirce-l@list.iupui.edu Subject: Aw: Re: [PEIRCE-L] [EXTERNAL] RE: André De Tienne: Slow Read slide 8 List, to claim that a logical sequence is n

Re: [PEIRCE-L] [EXTERNAL] RE: André De Tienne: Slow Read slide 8

2021-06-30 Thread JACK ROBERT KELLY CODY
philosophy/logic is not my mainstay and Peirce comes to me very much secondhand; but I appreciate this slow-read and each of you taking time to respond. Best Jack ____________ From: peirce-l-requ...@list.iupui.edu on behalf of Jon Alan Schmidt Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2021 7:5

Re: [PEIRCE-L] [EXTERNAL] RE: André De Tienne: Slow Read slide 8

2021-06-30 Thread Jon Alan Schmidt
ddresses that one directly in the > next slide (9), I think I’ll wait until that’s been posted. > > Gary f. > > } This sentence contradicts itself—or rather—well, no, actually it > doesn't! [Hofstadter] { > > https://gnusystems.ca/wp/ }{ living the time > > > >

RE: [PEIRCE-L] [EXTERNAL] RE: André De Tienne: Slow Read slide 8

2021-06-30 Thread gnox
Y Sent: 29-Jun-21 17:21 To: g...@gnusystems.ca Cc: peirce-l@list.iupui.edu Subject: Re: [PEIRCE-L] [EXTERNAL] RE: André De Tienne: Slow Read slide 8 Gary, list, GF: That’s why we can prescind Firstness from Secondness (or Thirdness), but we can’t prescind Secondness from Firstness, b

Re: [PEIRCE-L] [EXTERNAL] RE: André De Tienne: Slow Read slide 8

2021-06-29 Thread JACK ROBERT KELLY CODY
Gary, list, GF: That’s why we can prescind Firstness from Secondness (or Thirdness), but we can’t prescind Secondness from Firstness, because Secondness is not logically possible without Firstness. And that’s why there must be more to the phaneron than what we call reality, even though