List:
Just a brief comment on Professor Everett wide-reaching scientific assertion
that appears to me to subscribe too and pontificate about CSP writings with
respect to realism of scientific phenomenology.
> On Jul 18, 2023, at 1:44 PM, Thomas903 wrote:
>
> Dan,
>
> I wanted to comment
Tom, Dan, and Helmut,
We must distinguish three different systems: (1) the Large Language Modlels
(LLMs) which are derived from large volumes of texts, (2) ChatGPT and other
systems that use the LLMs for various purposes, and (3) the human brain + body
+ all the human experience of interacting
Dan and Tom,
That article by Steven Piantadosi, which is dated Marh 2023, is obsolete. The
author used a version of OpenAI, which was supposed to be based on GPT-4, but
was actually based on features that were added to 8 copies of GPT 3.5, Each
copy used the older version of GPT (LLMs by
Sorry - that doesn't do it for me. ChatGPT's success depends upon a priori
information & structures provided to it by humans. As I said before, this
is the equivalent of the "innate learning module" which you say is not
needed for learning language.
Since you were able to respond to my comment
Dan,
I wanted to comment briefly on a sentence from your earlier posting:
"ChatGPT simply and conclusively shows that there is no need for any innate
learning module in the brain to learn language."
1- ChatGPT did not evolve naturally, but was developed by humans who
certainly do understand how
y is too weak (it
>>> cannot extend beyond the sentence/proposition) and too strong (it creates
>>> faux problems such as the veritable core of most formal linguistics,
>>> “gap-filler” analyses, e.g. movement rules) whereas inferentialism provides
>>> the best cove
e this point based on much more
>> archaeological evidence from Homo erectus sites:
>> https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10816-020-09480-9
>>
>> All best,
>>
>> Dan
>>
>> On Apr 20, 2023, at 4:47 PM, Helmut Raulien wrote:
>>
>> Dan
pril 2023 um 20:28 Uhr
Von: "Dan Everett" <danleveret...@gmail.com>
An: "Helmut Raulien" <h.raul...@gmx.de>
Cc: g...@gnusystems.ca, "Peirce-L" <PEIRCE-L@list.iupui.edu>
Betreff: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Chat GPT and Peirce
You’ll have to read your way through the l
t his genetic grammar-module is not based on logic, then I would have to
> quote all he ever has written. The other way round would be easier. And:
> Refutation is a strong accusation, and I think the prosecutor has the
> burden of proof.
> Best, Helmut
>
>
> *Gesendet:*
h, 19. April 2023 um 20:28 Uhr
> Von: "Dan Everett"
> An: "Helmut Raulien"
> Cc: g...@gnusystems.ca, "Peirce-L"
> Betreff: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Chat GPT and Peirce
> You’ll have to read your way through the literature.
>
> D
>
> On Apr 19
You’ll have to read your way through the literature.
D
> On Apr 19, 2023, at 2:27 PM, Helmut Raulien wrote:
>
>
> Dan, List,
>
> First i apologize for posting unrelated in the main thread.
>
> I appreciate your argument and find it a great insight. Now, is this a
> refutation of
11 matches
Mail list logo
