gt; but also that there is also no theory independent of the practices that
> inform it.
>
> Appreciative regards, Martin Kettelhut
>
> --
> *From:* peirce-l-requ...@list.iupui.edu
> on behalf of Gary Richmond
> *Sent:* Saturday, April 27, 2024 4:10
> what people believe these days, however implausible to scientific (or even
> common) sense, they can find sources online that will reinforce their
> beliefs. Personally i'm not optimistic that semiotics can do much to
> reverse the trend of the Anthropocene. Maybe we can hope tha
Bateson] {
<https://gnusystems.ca/wp/> https://gnusystems.ca/wp/ }{
<https://gnusystems.ca/TS/> Turning Signs
From: peirce-l-requ...@list.iupui.edu On
Behalf Of Gary Richmond
Sent: Saturday, April 27, 2024 6:10 PM
To: g...@gnusystems.ca
Cc: peirce-l@list.iupui.edu
Subject: Re: [
f of Gary Richmond
Sent: Saturday, April 27, 2024 4:10 PM
To: g...@gnusystems.ca
Cc: peirce-l@list.iupui.edu
Subject: Re: [PEIRCE-L] the logic of vagueness
[Note: I'd like to replace my earlier response to Gary Fuhrman's post with this
one. The first was written in haste and, in fa
[Note: I'd like to replace my earlier response to Gary Fuhrman's post with
this one. The first was written in haste and, in fact, I'd forgotten I'd
sent it as it was nothing but a rough draft of some of the ideas I wanted
to reflect on. I hope that the present post will offer something of
substance
gary f., List,
Your post is such a rich cornucopia of ideas that I've decided to focus in
on just a short segment of it with some comments centered around the
quotations by Merleau-Ponty, Peirce, and William James. I'll start with
what amounts to little more than a paraphrase of the two quotations
