Supplement: All in all, I have the feeling, that by trying to distinguish the representamen from the object, and the immediate from the dynamical object, and including memory, then you look at more and more subsigns, the closer you try to analyse. But maybe that doesn´t matter, because with
Helmut - I think you have a lot of misunderstandings of Peirce - and can only
suggest: Read Peirce.
And think: How can an entity organized within Firstness [ pure vague feeling]
produce an entity organized within the much more restrictive mode of Secondness
[an actual single form]? Think of
Jerry, List:
I am honestly not sure exactly what all you are asking me to address here
and how my engineering background is relevant. What do you mean by "the
origins of the 'triadic relations'"? From what are we seeking to
distinguish Peirce's semeiotic? What do you have in mind as *semantic*
List
With regard to the use of the terms of ‘genuine, degenerate and doubly
degenerate’ - my understanding of these terms is that they refer only to the
categories. Not to the ’nodes’ and relations, ie, not to the two Objects or the
three Interpretants. .
For example, Peirce writes: “The Sign
