Gary R and Martin, i'm just now reading your posts in reply to the one i put up
last week.
Gary, you focus on Merleau-Ponty's reference to the “mystery” inherent in
“ipseity.” What this brings to my mind is not Heidegger, but rather Peirce's
own reference to Secondness as “the being that
Gary F, Martin, List,
I've been taking an informal self-refresher course on Merleau-Ponty's
phenomenology this week and had nearly completed a draft response to
Martin's message when your compelling and thought-provoking message
arrived. I'll finish that draft post and send it off in the next