Re: [PEIRCE-L] in case you were wondering

> On Dec 10, 2015, at 1:54 PM, Clark Goble wrote: > > I’d assume that for human beings aesthetics will be a mix of universal > aesthetically values (if there are any) and those indexed to our particular > biology and the physics of the world in which we live. Beyond that

Re: [PEIRCE-L] in case you were wondering

> On Dec 8, 2015, at 12:58 PM, Matt Faunce wrote: > >> Are you saying that we should judge music like we judge medicine—e.g., just >> because certain music works for me doesn't mean music that doesn't work for >> me is bad? Similarly, should we judge music like we judge

Re: [PEIRCE-L] signs, correlates, and triadic relations

Hi Gary, lists, You wrote: ". . . I don't see the point or relevance of Sung's (2) and (3), . " These items are reproduced below within quotation marks for convenience: "(*2*) According to the quark model of the Peircean sign discussed in earlier posts, the 9 types of signs (referred to as

Re: [PEIRCE-L] in case you were wondering

On 12/10/15 4:06 PM, Clark Goble wrote: Or we may recognize that we simply don’t have any confident way at this time of conducting that sort of analysis. I don't see a way out. Induction can't work when there are potentially infinite samples to be drawn, and the long-run opens up the pool of

[PEIRCE-L] ontogeny racapitulates phylogeny––but with a teleological twist = typological Bauplan

Desyllabication of /n/ in Consonant Clusters   GLOSSARY   Bauplan, n.: building plan, blueprint (German) desyllabication, n. < desyllabicate, v.: to cause or undergo the loss of a syllable epenthetic, adj. < epenthesis, n.: the occurrence of an intercalated consonant (such