Kirsti,
We are in violent agreement.
I looked at the slides you provided. With as good as all of them,
was mark 'wrong', wrong, and again wrong.
I have been doing R & D in AI for years, and the point I'm trying
to make is that current AI research is *on the wrong track* .
I presented an
Gary, list,
I think, democracy is a matter of systems theory. But Peirce, I think, did not go into systems theories, as he built a theory of signs in a universal phaneron, which works without having to look at interpreting systems such as individuals, social systems, countries or nations. That
Stefan,
Thank you for the information. Good to know. - However, I do not think
I'll ever take the trouble of finding these books.
With any close-read of texts it is sufficient for a big while to know
that laws need an approach of their own. - No hand of a sheriff with
any, however
Kirsti,
i have not read the book on law. The bibliographic info is:
Schapp, Wilhelm: Die neue Wissenschaft vom Recht. Eine phänomenologische
Untersuchung. Berlin-Grunewald. Dr. Walther Rothschild.
But the book is out of print and i also can't find it at
https://www.zvab.com (the central
Stefan,
This gets more and more interesting! Please, do provide the details! - I
have spent quite a while in moderating my methods of text
interpretations for developing a way which works in interpreting law.
Very, very different methods are needed, that's for sure. 'Tradition'
for
