Re: [PEIRCE-L] Chat GPT and Peirce

’s approach to language - > lingbuzz/007180 <https://ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/007180> > ling.auf.net <https://ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/007180> > [image: favicon.ico] <https://ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/007180> > <https://ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/007180> > > > On Jul 18, 2023

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Chat GPT and Peirce

Dan, I wanted to comment briefly on a sentence from your earlier posting: "ChatGPT simply and conclusively shows that there is no need for any innate learning module in the brain to learn language." 1- ChatGPT did not evolve naturally, but was developed by humans who certainly do understand how

Re: [PEIRCE-L] A PRIZE OF LOGIC IN EVERY COUNTRY !

Great idea, awesome execution of it! (A future step could be organizing the national units into a larger organization.) Tom Wyrick On Friday, July 7, 2017, jean-yves beziau wrote: > After launching the Newton da Costa Prize of Logic in Brazil 2015 >

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Re: Laws of Nature as Signs

Group ~ Going back to the original question, I believe a "law of nature" is characterized differently, in terms of Sign relationships, depending upon one of three ('ness) perspectives from which the "law of nature" is being considered: 1 - To Peirce-Emerson-The Sphinx: Existence consists solely

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Pragmatism and Sign as holon as mind-body as tool

Stephen J., List ~ A - "The notion of body-as-tool is a very important one because it sheds light on so many things." B- “If Your Only Tool Is a Hammer Then Every Problem Looks Like a Nail” If my body is a tool (hands, feet, eyes, etc.), then how can my ONLY tool be a hammer or any other

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Peirce and Science (was Democracy)

John Sowa, others ~ I wanted to comment on statements made last night about the meaning of law-theory-hypothesis. For convenience (i.e., mine), I will address your statements in a different order: 1-3-2. See below. Regards, Tom Wyrick "Scientists make a three-way distinction of hypotheses,