Re: [PEIRCE-L] Fw: [biosemiotics:8592] Re: Natural

2015-05-08 Thread Sungchul Ji
Oh, I forgot to add one more to the list of the concepts and principles embodied in Figure 1 of my previous post, i.e., (vi) the mathematical theory of categories. As you can see, I am able to connect these diverse elements of discourses in one theoretical framework (whose validity remains to be

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Fw: [biosemiotics:8592] Re: Natural

2015-05-08 Thread Sungchul Ji
Helmut, You are raising some interesting questions. I wonder if mind is irreducibly triadic, meaning that it has three properties that are inseparably linked like a Borromean. I am inclined to refer to these three properties or aspects of mind as 'mind as IS' (1ns mind), 'mind as EXPERIENCED' (2

[PEIRCE-L] Fw: [biosemiotics:8592] Re: Natural

2015-05-06 Thread Helmut Raulien
      Supplement: Patient and agent for me are not a dyad, but parts of a triad, consisting of: Patiens, Agens, Effect. Neither of these three is thinkable or senseful with one of them missing. Dear Stan, Peirceans, Dyadicity or triadicity? My hypothesis about dyadicity is, that there are t