To: peirce-l@list.iupui.edu; biosemiot...@lists.ut.ee
Subject: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Natural Propositions, Chapter 3.10
Gary F., lists,
Your quote from EP2:286 makes a lot of sense but it's from Sundry Logical
Conceptions, MS 478 (EP 2), the third part of the manuscript of Syllabus.
In that part Peirce
] Natural Propositions, Chapter 3.10
I am interested in whether language is, in this context, basic to
secondness. At some point a sign (a first) is given a name. I have
generally thought this naming was a sort of conclusion of firstness and that
secondness was where the name (word) encountered
. Rose
*Sent:* 13-Oct-14 12:56 PM
*To:* Gary Fuhrman
*Cc:* Peirce List; biosemiot...@lists.ut.ee
*Subject:* Re: [PEIRCE-L] Natural Propositions, Chapter 3.10
I am interested in whether language is, in this context, basic to
secondness. At some point a sign (a first) is given a name. I have
” — can you point me to that?
gary f.
From: Benjamin Udell [mailto:bud...@nyc.rr.com]
Sent: 15-Oct-14 2:42 PM
To: 'Peirce List'; biosemiot...@lists.ut.ee
Subject: [biosemiotics:7236] Re: [PEIRCE-L] Natural Propositions, Chapter 3.10
Gary F., Stephen, lists,
Gary F. wrote,
When an object
individual” — can you point me to that?
gary f.
*From:* Benjamin Udell
*Sent:* 15-Oct-14 2:42 PM
*To:* 'Peirce List'; biosemiot...@lists.ut.ee
*Subject:* [biosemiotics:7236] Re: [PEIRCE-L] Natural Propositions,
Chapter 3.10
Gary F., Stephen, lists,
Gary F. wrote,
When an /object/ is given
Lists,
After spending three weeks on Chapter 3 of NP, we have one more week to go
before Tyler Bennett launches our discussion of Chapter 4.
Section 3.10 is again a relatively long and complex one, pointing out some
of the other implications of the continuity Peirce sees in semiosis. One
I am interested in whether language is, in this context, basic to
secondness. At some point a sign (a first) is given a name. I have
generally thought this naming was a sort of conclusion of firstness and
that secondness was where the name (word) encountered the somewhat brutal
function of an
