Janet,
Excellent, thank you for this. It seems more likely to me now that a
digitization process somewhere along the way introduced the new errors.
With gratitude,
Franklin
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jan 11, 2022, at 1:01 AM, Janet Singer wrote:
>
>
> Franklin,
> The two errors you noted
Wow, and I found those multiple copies in Google books, only the 1854
1st edition but many copies. I assumed that the errors were in those
1st editions and that you had found them.
Well, maybe you can find more clues in a search on "Boole" in the
collection _Studies in the Logic of Charles
List,
I was just able to find an original copy of the book scanned into Google Books,
and it is indeed free of the typographical errors found in recent editions such
as my Watchmaker Publishing copy and in the version on Project Gutenberg.
Several years ago it was not available on Google
Dear Franklin, list,
It is walking on landmines to figure out someone else’s intention and
deliver your opinion out loud in public
*as if *your opinion is the only one that is correct.
However, if your purpose is, “to understand better the genesis of Peirce’s
work in logic”,
then you could
List,
After receiving an off-list suggestion to pick up an introduction to symbolic
logic and use Wikipedia as a resource, it will be well for me to clarify that I
am quite familiar with symbolic logic, having mastered sentential logic and
predicate calculus, dabbled in modal logic, and gotten
Hello list,
It has been some years since I lasted posted, and I have only been lurking ever
since.
I am hoping to get some advice on reading George Boole’s An Investigation of
the Laws of Thought. This is a text which CS Peirce references in his earlier
logical work, and I was hoping to
