Re: [PEIRCE-L] Re: [biosemiotics:8831] Re: Anticipation and Semiotics: One Cannot

2015-08-28 Thread Sungchul Ji
Tom, lists, I agree with your excellent interpretation of Mona Lisa. But, to me, that is not all there is to Mona Lisa. There may be much more to the painting. There may be something unique (or local) about Mona Lisa that has not been (and most likely will never be) reproduced by any other

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Re: [biosemiotics:8831] Re: Anticipation and Semiotics: One Cannot

2015-08-27 Thread Sungchul Ji
Tom, lists, I accept the aesthetic interpretation of Mona Lisa you cited. But to some researchers, Mona Lisa embodies more than aesthetics but embodies also chemistry and physics, because Mona Lisa is a COMPLEX object. I think you may be referring to only one of the many aspects of a complex

[PEIRCE-L] Re: [biosemiotics:8831] Re: Anticipation and Semiotics: One Cannot

2015-08-25 Thread Sungchul Ji
Hi Ed, Thanks for your interesting suggestion that the geometric principle of tetraktys may underlie all organizations, including the organization in Mona Lisa. Since I have been led to conclude in 1991 [1] that all organizations in the Universe are driven by *energy dissipation *under the

[PEIRCE-L] Re: [biosemiotics:8831] Re: Anticipation and Semiotics: One Cannot

2015-08-24 Thread Sungchul Ji
Hi Gary S, Gary R, lists, A thought just occurred to me that there may be a connection between the beauty of Mona Lisa (holism) and the various chemical pigments (reductionism) that constitute it -- namely, the organization of matter at two distinct scales, one at the macroscopic scale and the