I thought I raised a valid point but I think it turned out to be a red
flag. Sorry.
Books http://buff.ly/15GfdqU Art: http://buff.ly/1wXAxbl
Gifts: http://buff.ly/1wXADj3
On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 7:52 PM, Benjamin Udell wrote:
> Stephen, please don't join in the insultingly trivializing games t
Stephen, please don't join in the insultingly trivializing games that
others have played with the meaning of "Peirce-related", and please
don't convert it to a question of what is Peirce is relevant or related
to. PEIRCE-L has the audience that it has because of the promise of
Peirce-related di
Peirce is relevant to the issues we are discussing, particularly to the
relationship between semiosis then and now, to the growing iteration and
acceptance of triadic rather than binary thinking, and to the huge sea
change which Helmut just noted. There is a text probably prominent on
Arisbe that l
Folks, I'm not the moderator (that's Gary Richmond), just the
co-manager, but it seems like this thread has gotten away from
explicitly Peirce-related matters. Is it possible to bring it back to
Peirce matters?
Best, Ben
On 7/12/2015 6:24 PM, Thomas wrote:
Helmet ~
Local "culture" is like a
Helmet ~
Local "culture" is like a species or a language or a market area: largely
defined by limits on transportation.
Since culture travels on the internet (literature, movies, news, fashion,
music) much faster than people can travel/migrate/mix by conventional means,
certain shared values a
ob, i.e., a band of thugs'.
Democracy is not, in itself, a barrier against barbarism. As Tolstoy said, 'Wrong does not cease to be wrong because the majority shares in it'. Democracy, to be just, requires a constitution and the rule of law, set up as created by men, and capable of ch
n it'. Democracy, to be just, requires a constitution and the rule of law, set up as created by men, and capable of change by men, but applicable to all.
Edwina
- Original Message -
From: Helmut Raulien
To: Ozzie
Cc: Edwina Taborsky ; ; Peirce List
Sent: Friday, July 10, 2015 2:51 P
x27;. Democracy, to be just, requires a constitution and the rule of law, set up as created by men, and capable of change by men, but applicable to all.
Edwina
- Original Message -
From: Helmut Raulien
To: Ozzie
Cc: Edwina Taborsky ; ; Peirce List
Sent: Friday, July 10, 2015 2:51 PM
Subje
ascism or Hitler's political tactics.
Edwina
- Original Message -
From: Helmut Raulien
To: stever...@gmail.com
Cc: Edwina Taborsky ; Peirce List
Sent: Friday, July 10, 2015 12:50 PM
Subject: Aw: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Recently published: Hitler and Abductive Logic
Now I am wonderin
Now I am wondering, which of the four methods of fixating belief did Hitler use? According to Ben Novak it is like this, I think: He was tenacious, but that is not the main point. He used authority, but that is not the main point either. Also he took advantage of apriorian ituition and instincts,
Read Ben Novaks dissertation first, Id say: It is really suspensefully written, like a detective story, and very enlighting. Todays parallels to Hitlers success by creating abductive myths surely is not feminism, but conspiracy theories (chemtrails, astronauts were not on the moon, 9/11
Read Ben Novaks dissertation first, Id say: It is really suspensefully written, like a detective story, and very enlighting. Todays parallels to Hitlers success by creating abductive myths surely is not feminism, but conspiracy theories (chemtrails, astronauts were not on the moon, 9/11 was an ins
Gesendet: Dienstag, 07. Juli 2015 um 23:05 Uhr
Von: "Helmut Raulien"
An: stever...@gmail.com
Cc: "Edwina Taborsky" , "Peirce List"
Betreff: Aw: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Recently published: Hitler and Abductive Logic
I think, abduction in itself is not a bad thin
I think, abduction in itself is not a bad thing: It is the "brainstorm" that shows several possibilities of further inquiry (or possibilities of shaping a political opinion). Critical, I think, is, what follows after the abduction: Is it induction and deduction/scientific method, with a democrat
14 matches
Mail list logo
