Nice.
It's interesting that logic depends upon ethics and, in turn, aesthetics
when dependence is itself a logical relation.
Rather hard to get one's head around.
On 3/26/2012 9:48 PM, Jon Awbrey wrote:
Peircers,
I found the figure I used to draw to explain that
pragmatic ordering of the
Here is an example:
Fallibilism applies to both scientists and religionists http://ping.fm/a5wzV
*ShortFormContent at Blogger* http://shortformcontent.blogspot.com/
-
You are receiving this message because you are
Jon and others...
This overview of mine on your idea is merely a curiosity, yet it
is also a thorn for me, and my overview may be off base, but let
me thrash it out.
There could be a difference to note in the giving or getting of
the categories in regard to determinacy and dependency. (This
I am waiting for the day when values replaces ethics as a base term for
discussing morality and, if a hierarchy is pertinent, when ontological
values would be right up there wherever thought (musement) begins. I think
we have confused virtues and characteristics with values from the gitgo.
(See
Peircers,
Here's another prospectus on normative inquiry that I wrote up in September
1992.
Prospects For Inquiry Driven Systems
1.3.1. Logic, Ethics, Esthetics
The philosophy I find myself converging to more often lately is the pragmatism of C.S. Peirce and John Dewey. According
to this
Leo, Jon, List,
*
Although there's a great deal more to be said about the relations of ethics,
esthetic (Peirce's spelling for the theoretical science), and logic as
semeiotic, a quick and dirty response to your comment that It's interesting
that logic depends upon ethics and, in turn,
A Facebook acquaintance posted this on my wall ...
Bakhtin Meets Pocahontas --
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GITVPh7GVSE
Cheers,
Jon
--
academia: http://independent.academia.edu/JonAwbrey
inquiry list: http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/
mwb: http://www.mywikibiz.com/Directory:Jon_Awbrey
