Re: [peirce-l] A new dissertation on Walker Percy and Charles Peirce

2012-02-26 Thread James Albrecht
Excellent capsule summary of Van Fraassen. I would only add that much of the book is devoted to exploring the question of how science can rationally progress through conceptual revolutions when the post revolutionary view is irrational according to the pre-revolution view. Very engaging discussion

Re: [peirce-l] A New Dissertation on Walker Percy and Charles Peirce

2012-02-26 Thread Jon Awbrey
Peircers, Synchroncity In The Asynchronous World (SITAW) !!! We recently had a discussion of related issues on PolicyMic ... http://www.policymic.com/articles/why-the-pope-can-t-be-tried-at-the-icc#comment-16229 Regards, Jon Benjamin Udell wrote: James, list, Theology, Catholic or otherwis

Re: [peirce-l] A new dissertation on Walker Percy and Charles Peirce

2012-02-26 Thread Benjamin Udell
James, list, Theology, Catholic or otherwise, is hardly my forte, and I find on first look into infallibilism (i.e., Wikipedia) that Catholic infallibilism is itself largely a theoretical idea, like you say, and the list of supposedly infallible statements is a matter of debate, but the Immacul