Gary,
This is not exactly Popper's view, although this is how Popper has often been
interpreted, e.g. by Ayer, in Language, Truth, and Logic. Popper's
falsificationism is based on a purely logical asymmetry between falsification
and verification in that a single counterexample will refute a
and the Autonomy of the Semiosis
Process
I agree with Peter.
Steven
On Aug 5, 2011, at 11:01 AM, Skagestad, Peter wrote:
Gary,
I agree that falsifiability entails the fallibility of scientific knowledge.
But the fallibilty of perceptual judgements, which is affirmed by both Peirce
and Popper
I am now opening the slow read of Joe Ransdell’s paper ‘The Relevance of
Peircean Semiotic to Computational Intelligence Augmentation’, the final paper
in this slow read series. I realize that Steven’s slow read is still in
progress, but we have had overlapping reads before.
Since we are
I personally have no objection.
Peter
From: Jon Awbrey [jawb...@att.net]
Sent: Saturday, December 03, 2011 1:26 PM
To: Skagestad, Peter; Arisbe List; Inquiry List
Cc: PEIRCE-L@LISTSERV.IUPUI.EDU
Subject: “The Relevance Of Peircean Semiotic
Gary,
Yes, I agree; that is explicit enough. Thanks for digging this up.
Peter
From: C S Peirce discussion list [PEIRCE-L@LISTSERV.IUPUI.EDU] on behalf of
Gary Fuhrman [g...@gnusystems.ca]
Sent: Saturday, December 03, 2011 5:19 PM
To:
that articulated by Joe. I do not know whether he ever completed his
projected book on the subject.
Cheers,
Peter
From: Gary Richmond [richmon...@lagcc.cuny.edu]
Sent: Saturday, December 03, 2011 7:16 PM
To: PEIRCE-L@LISTSERV.IUPUI.EDU; Skagestad, Peter
Subject: Re
.
Best,
Gary
Gary Richmond
Philosophy and Critical Thinking
Communication Studies
LaGuardia College of the City University of New York
E202-O
718 482-5700
*** *** *** ***
Skagestad, Peter 12/04/11 11:29 AM
Gary,
Just a couple of comments. In my view Peirce and Turing play analogous
roles in some
- Original Message -
From: Skagestad, Peter
To: PEIRCE-L@LISTSERV.IUPUI.EDU
Sent: Saturday, December 03, 2011 11:43 AM
Subject: [peirce-l] SLOW READ: THE RELEVANCE OF PEIRCEAN SEMIOTIC TO
COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE AUGMENTATION
I am now opening the slow read of Joe Ransdell’s paper
]
Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2011 2:26 PM
To: PEIRCE-L@LISTSERV.IUPUI.EDU; Skagestad, Peter
Subject: RE: [peirce-l] SLOW READ: THE RELEVANCE OF PEIRCEAN SEMIOTIC TO
COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE AUGMENTATION
Peter, Ben, List,
Thanks for your response, Peter. I look forward to your introducing
of the City University of New York
E202-O
718 482-5700
*** *** *** ***
Skagestad, Peter 01/01/12 12:54 PM
Happy New Year, everyone!
Resuming the slow read of Joe Ransdell’s “The Relevance of Peircean
Semiotic to Computational Intelligence Augmentation,” we now move on to
the description
Thanks. I have not had a chance to read it yet, but it certainly looks relevant.
Peter
From: C S Peirce discussion list [PEIRCE-L@LISTSERV.IUPUI.EDU] on behalf of
Gary Richmond [richmon...@lagcc.cuny.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2012 6:05 PM
To:
To: Skagestad, Peter; PEIRCE-L@LISTSERV.IUPUI.EDU
Subject: Re: [peirce-l] SLOW READ: THE RELEVANCE OF PEIRCEAN SEMIOTIC TO
COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE AUGMENTATION
Dear Peter,
Maybe I missed this in earlier comments, so forgive me if the observation is
redundant.
As you suggest below, in several
Philosophy and Critical Thinking
Communication Studies
LaGuardia College of the City University of New York
E202-O
718 482-5700
*** *** *** ***
Skagestad, Peter 01/29/12 3:35 PM
List,
I am a little surprised at the lack of follow-up from the list to
Steve's suggestions, below. I do not personally have
13 matches
Mail list logo
