Re: [peirce-l] C.S. Peirce • Objective Logic

2012-03-10 Thread Jon Awbrey
Peircers, Short on time till Monday, but I was able to redo the Objective Logic excepts as a blog post, that may be easier to read all in one piece: http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2012/03/09/c-s-peirce-%E2%80%A2-objective-logic/ Regards, Jon -- academia: http://independent.academia.edu/JonAwb

Re: [peirce-l] C.S. Peirce • Objective Logic

2012-03-09 Thread Jon Awbrey
o~o~o~o~o~o Note 4 o~o~o~o~o~o Objective Logic (cont.) Aristotelianism admitted two modes of being. This position was attacked by William Ockham, on the ground that one kind sufficed to account for all the phenome

Re: [peirce-l] C.S. Peirce • Objective Logic

2012-03-09 Thread Jon Awbrey
Gary, Sorry, the incitement for this reading is that array of questions that arose in regard to the relations among Peirce's categories, predicates of predicates, the possibly finite sequence of intentions, and the "modes of being" that he mentioned in his passage about Predicaments. I had to in

Re: [peirce-l] C.S. Peirce • Objective Logic

2012-03-09 Thread Gary Richmond
Jon, It would be helpful if you'd add some context to a message which is entirely a quotation. Best, Gary On 3/9/12, Jon Awbrey wrote: > o~o~o~o~o~o > > Note 2 > > o~o~o~o~o~o > > Objective Logic (cont.) > > The fi

Re: [peirce-l] C.S. Peirce • Objective Logic

2012-03-09 Thread Jon Awbrey
o~o~o~o~o~o Note 3 o~o~o~o~o~o Objective Logic (cont.) But whatever be the kind and degree of our logical assurance that there is any real world, external or internal, that same kind and degree of assurance we cer

Re: [peirce-l] C.S. Peirce • Objective Logic

2012-03-09 Thread Jon Awbrey
o~o~o~o~o~o Note 2 o~o~o~o~o~o Objective Logic (cont.) The first question, then, which I have to ask is: Supposing such a thing to be true, what is the kind of proof which I ought to demand to satisfy me of its tr

[peirce-l] C.S. Peirce • Objective Logic

2012-03-08 Thread Jon Awbrey
| Objective Logic | | With Speculative Rhetoric, Logic, in the sense of Normative Semeotic, | is brought to a close. But now we have to examine whether there be a | doctrine of signs corresponding to Hegel's objective logic; that is to | say, whether there be a life in Signs, so that — the requi