whom I write and speak.
Therefore this is not an offhand observation of yours but an
observation of the /aporia/ of existence itself. The fundamental real
problem is not ‘fixing’ terminology but of aligning myself with others
to communicate on the same plain of actual existence.
Regards,
Gary
but of aligning myself with others to
communicate on the same plain of actual existence.
Regards,
Gary
From: Benjamin Udell
To: PEIRCE-L@LISTSERV.IUPUI.EDU
Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2012 2:10 PM
Subject: Re: [peirce-l] ORDINARY DISCOURSE AS THE FINAL CAUSE OF ALL
INTELLECTUAL ENDEAVORS
Gary M
to language by way of a discussion of Kleist's
essays on marionette theatre and the shaping of thought at the point
of utterance." It has been a while since I have dealt with Kleist’s
essays on marionettes and Immanuel Kant. Has a better format and
treatment of his essays occurred I d
essays on marionettes and Immanuel Kant.
Has a better format and treatment of his essays occurred I do not know about?
Regards,
Gary Moore
From: John Harvey
To: Peirce-L
Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2012 10:28 AM
Subject: Re: [peirce-l] ORDINARY DISCOURSE AS THE FINAL CAUSE OF ALL
INTELLECTU
Gary, Phyllis, list,
The use of "ambiguity" and "precision" or "clarity" as antonyms is what
I. A. Richards might have called a "killer dichotomy"[1] which doesn't
recognize they are all on the continuum of discourse academic as well as
ordinary. Before a more precise term can be used by more
Moore
From: Phyllis Chiasson
To: 'Gary Moore' ; PEIRCE-L@LISTSERV.IUPUI.EDU
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2012 5:14 PM
Subject: RE: [peirce-l] ORDINARY DISCOURSE AS THE FINAL CAUSE OF ALL
INTELLECTUAL ENDEAVORS
Dear Gary,
Since language only has meaning within contexts, change the context a
rom: C S Peirce discussion list [mailto:PEIRCE-L@LISTSERV.IUPUI.EDU] On
Behalf Of Gary Moore
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2012 8:24 AM
To: PEIRCE-L@LISTSERV.IUPUI.EDU
Subject: [peirce-l] ORDINARY DISCOURSE AS THE FINAL CAUSE OF ALL
INTELLECTUAL ENDEAVORS
To whom it may concern:
In trying to muddle th
