[peirce-l] Peirce and Prigogine

2006-04-22 Thread Jerry LR Chandler
To List, especially Victoria and Gary: I would like to add a few comments to these highly controversial posts on Peirce and Prigogine. Before you a priori reject these comments as being scientifically illiterate, I feel that I ought to say a few words relevant to my point of view.

[peirce-l] Re: Peirce and Prigogine

2006-04-22 Thread Benjamin Udell
List, Just wanted to note that I'm having second thoughts about the idea that decay is not an end! But I'll keep it at least somewhat short because Jerry LR Chandler's post looks interesting. (I read some things at http://www.hyle.org/ (philosophy of chemistry) a few years ago, including

[peirce-l] Re: Peirce and Prigogine

2006-04-22 Thread gnusystems
Ben, Victoria, Jerry, I may not be responding properly to your messages for a few days because i have a deadline to deal with first. But in the meantime -- For Victoria (and anyone else who cares to look), i've excerpted some pieces from my work in progress that develop a concept of