Gary, Joe, list,
I downloaded the chapter from Merkle's dissertation last night and it
downloaded quite quickly compared to the daytime when the Internet is busier.
What graphics! Very little in the way of my shadings, very much in the way of
exactness and complexity. If somebody asked me t
Ben, Joe, list,
I would highly recommend for those interested in further exploring the
themes of this discussion--and, yes, thanks very much to Joe, Ben and
others for providing such a wealth of valuable information, diagrams,
etc.--the fourth chapter of Luis Merkle's dissertation to which he
Ben,
-Original Message-
From: Benjamin Udell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: vrijdag 16 juni 2006 16:25
To: Peirce Discussion Forum
Subject: [peirce-l] Re: Sinsign, Legisign, Qualisign
MessageAuke, list,
>[Auke] Ben I have the feeling that much of your uneasyness is a
>consequence of
Joe, list,
It will be interesting to find out what you thought was wrong about what
the editors were saying. Again, thank you for your efforts in this!
So, putting things together, the only numbering by Peirce which we have
consists in the ordinal English numbers which match the 10-box tri
Ben and list:
As regards the question of which of the three images of the triangle of
boxes in the manuscript material is the one which was actually relied upon
by the editors of the Collected Papers for the image of it that appears at
CP 2.264, it is reasonably certain that it is the second on
Thanks for the suggestions, Bill.
Joe Ransdell
- Original Message -
From: "Bill Hall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Peirce Discussion Forum"
Sent: Saturday, June 17, 2006 6:41 PM
Subject: [peirce-l] Digitization of Peirce's work
All,
I am not yet a Peirce scholar, but I do know a bit abo
