[PEIRCE-L] Re: Re: Collateral Experience and Habits of Interpretation (was Immediate Objects and Phenomena)

2018-02-02 Thread Jon Alan Schmidt
Edwina, List: In that case, I am content for now with the level of agreement that we have managed to achieve, and thus will not press the matter any further at this time. I intend to reread and reflect on Peirce's relevant texts like "New Elements" (1904) and "Pragmatism" (1907) as I continue to

[PEIRCE-L] Re: Re: Collateral Experience and Habits of Interpretation (was Immediate Objects and Phenomena)

2018-02-02 Thread Edwina Taborsky
BODY { font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12px; }Jon - yes, I see the Representamen quite differently from you. I think you see it as passive - it 'stands for the Object to the Interpretant'. Whereas, I see it as an active force of mediation and transformation. I see it,