RE: RE: [PEIRCE-L] Asking for Specifics

2018-04-20 Thread frances.kelly
Frances to Edwina and listers--- My search goes on for a Peircean approach to at least metaphysical being. In response to your kind reply, consider some of my rambling tentative guesses, but without any specific Peircean references. (The new lettered paras directly below roughly refer to the e

Aw: Re: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Asking for Specifics

2018-04-13 Thread Helmut Raulien
Edwina, list, I find your dialogue between DOs very interesting, like in your examples some days ago, with the wind, water, and waves. Then I thought, maybe when there is such an interaction, the sign grows spatially: The DOs merge to one DO. Like, first, when there is only the wind but no waves,

Re: RE: [PEIRCE-L] Asking for Specifics

2018-04-12 Thread Edwina Taborsky
Frances - thanks for your comments. I'll try to respond below On Wed 11/04/18 10:13 PM , frances.ke...@sympatico.ca sent: Frances in the wings to Edwina and listers--- 1. Allow me to musingly guess, it perhaps may be the representamen of phenomena that fully fills the whole cosm

Re: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Asking for Specifics

2018-04-12 Thread Edwina Taborsky
Mike, list - Thanks for your supportive comments. I'll try to clear up some points. 1] When I say that a degenerate mode of Thirdness is operating, I don't mean that it excludes - within the whole triad - the other modes. For example, with the bird beak - Let's say tha