I know that the political debate is shifting to the right, but what are we
doing debating whether or not deficits are bad?
Every real penner knows how to balance the budget. Tax the rich. Cut
corporate perqs. The progressive caucus has already provided a plan to
do this.
Of course, congress
On Sat, 10 Jun 1995, Michael Perelman wrote:
Don't we have more important questions to address?
--
Jerry:
Good question. What would you suggest for the next questions to address?
I think that the important thing from the point of view of pen-lers being
involved in the balanced budget debate is that the whole thrust of the
debate is reduce taxes on the rich and abolish as much as possible any
expenditures for health, welfare, education and so on, that is remove as
much
At 8:48 AM 6/10/95, Michael Perelman wrote:
I know that the political debate is shifting to the right, but what are we
doing debating whether or not deficits are bad?
Every real penner knows how to balance the budget. Tax the rich. Cut
corporate perqs. The progressive caucus has already
To all:
Apologies: Jim Devine has kindly pointed out to me that I messed
up the order of the 'three questions' in my last posting, [PEN-L 5422].
Sorry to all:
It results from a last-minute change of numbering order without
cross-checking the remainder of the post for consistency, late at
On Sat, 10 Jun 1995, Doug Henwood wrote:
Part of what the deficit discussion is a sorting out of "progressive
economists'" relation to Keynes. With Marx very un-chic, many progressives
- or, as Alex Cockburn says, pwogwessives - have embraced JMK as an
acceptable alternative. Which Keynes
There was a question here the other day, I think from Jim Devine, about the
aggregate global fiscal stance. It just so happens that the new IMF World
Economic Outlook (May 1995) is out, with its estimate of what the Fund
calls "fiscal impulse" (FI). For its definition of FI, the IMF points to
the
Doug forgot to add, in his list of two sided keyneses: the heterosexual or
the homosexual.
I think the budget debate is important in that the gap represents the
inability of the existing government in a capitalist country to hold things
together, and examining where the budget gap has
Doug Henwood writes: "with Marx very un-chic, many progressives ... have
embraced JMK as an acceptable alternative."
If there really are "many," Doug should have no trouble providing copious
examples of progressives throwing over Marx for Keynes. If not, perhaps
we can sustain a discussion
I'm highly influenced by being midstream in a piece I'm working on about
New Zealand and what I'm putting into my conclusion. I think it's
important to engage in intellectual debate, but agree with MMeeropol (aka
gramps) that we stand at a watershed event. Those who have the skills to
Michael, in despair wrote:
I know that the political debate is shifting to the right, but what are we
doing debating whether or not deficits are bad?
Every real penner knows how to balance the budget. Tax the rich. Cut
corporate perqs. The progressive caucus has already provided a plan to
do
Colin wrote:
JMK's theory of an economy in which production takes time and requires
financing, and his development of a class theory of capitalism based on the
fact of its operation in historical time (see ch1 of the _Tract on Monetary
Reform_ for a quick sketch), are useful supplements to
THE NATION May 22, 1995
A visit with MOM
MONTANA'S MOTHER OF ALL MILITIAS
Marc Cooper
Noxon, Montana
Randy Trochmann, the 27-year-old co-founder and
one of the leaders of the Militia of Montana -- MOM
-- has a neat little
Hi,
In his eulogy for Louis Althusser (reprinted in _The Althusserian Legacy_,
ed. E. Ann Kaplan and Michael Sprinker. London: Verso, 1993) Jacques
Derrida quotes from Althusser's _Bertolazzi et Brecht_ (1962). The quote ends
with the following sentence: "We share the same story -- and that is
The original aricle from which Derrida quoted is titled as 'Le "Piccolo,"
Bertolazzi et Brecht (Notes sur un Theatre Materialiste)', and was published
in 'Esprit', vol.30, no.12, Dec. 1962 (pp.946-65) at first.
Its English translation was included in, as you may know, 'For Marx.'
You can refer
I disagree with Bill Mitchell's statment that environmental
considerations mean the abolition of poverty is impossible.
The physical resources of the Earth may be finite but technological
development is not. New technologies being developed will allow
for more efficient use of resources,
16 matches
Mail list logo