]
Sent: Sunday, April 11, 2004 5:48 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PEN-L] A critique of Paul Sweezy...
I received this message from a fellow worker. I
thought those interested in progressive economics
might find the critique of interest.
Regards,
Mike B
it involves so-called microfoundations.)
Jim Devine [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/~jdevine
-Original Message-
From: Mike Ballard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, April 11, 2004 5:48 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PEN-L] A critique of Paul
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 3:49 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PEN-L] A critique of Paul Sweezy...
What do you mean by show[ing Marx's] ... 'falling rate of profit'
scenario works out in practice. No-one has yet done so, at
least not in
the orthodox framework
to previous debates. My impression is that it may, and certainly the
writing is careful and respectful.
Chris Burford
London
- Original Message -
From: Mike Ballard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 12, 2004 1:48 AM
Subject: [PEN-L] A critique of Paul Sweezy...
I
I received this message from a fellow worker. I
thought those interested in progressive economics
might find the critique of interest.
Regards,
Mike B)
***
http://www.wsws.org
ran a four-part series on the legacy of Paul Sweezy
this past
