[EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/28/04 10:15 AM
But isn't that because Truman took a hard shift to the left to co-opt
Wallace supporters?
But presidential campaigns are where the most intense discussions about
war
and peace, the economy, race, etc. are held. People's attention are
riveted
on them in a way
You are really smart.
J.
i realize that part of above is rhetorical flourish but...
re. pfp in 68: cleaver doug dowd (bless his heart) were on ballot in
12-13-14 states, received about 75,000 votes nationwide, made no
difference in any state (which is what folks must focus on re. prez
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/24/04 4:23 PM
(I sort of doubt whether Ralph Nader will have the time or the
inclination to answer Ted Glick's questions, but I'd like to take a stab
at them myself.)
Should the Peace and Freedom Party have worked out a deal with
the Democrats in 1968 to make sure that
Michael Hoover:
re. witch hunt: if reference is to truman (who as senator in 40 had said
on senate floor that us should back which ever side was winning between
soviets and nazis and then turn on winner), loyalty oaths and other
ferreting out of 'reds' precedes 48, in any event, wallace made no
(I sort of doubt whether Ralph Nader will have the time or the
inclination to answer Ted Glick's questions, but I'd like to take a stab
at them myself.)
http://www.zmag.org/content/showarticle.cfm?SectionID=33ItemID=5034
Eight Questions for Ralph Nader
by Ted Glick
February 23, 2004
THIRD PARTY
