KPFA had a debate between Cobb & Camejo regarding the charge of the rigged
convention. It did not sound nearly as clear cut as it was presented here.
I was once on a jury panel for Camejo, but was kicked off & left with a clenched fist
salute. I liked what he did when I was at Berkeley, but in
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 08/11/04 8:32 AM >>>
many technical/procedural/justice problems arise from 1787
constitutional language assigning each state authority to determine
times, places, manner of holding elections...
<>
meant to note in above portion of earlier point that congress may at an
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 08/11/04 3:03 AM >>>
At 1:03 AM -0400 8/11/04, Michael Hoover wrote:
>of course, my point was that nader people have not - and will not -
>raise equal protection matter (although they'll - no doubt, and
>rightly so - complain about being exluded from prez debates)...
Have you
ay people can
gain political experience except by trying, failing, and trying again
over at least several decades.
--
Yoshie
* Critical Montages: <http://montages.blogspot.com/>
* Greens for Nader: <http://greensfornader.net/>
* Bring Them Home Now! <http://www.bringthemhomenow.org
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 08/10/04 3:16 PM >>>
At 1:07 PM -0400 8/9/04, Michael Hoover wrote:
>nader people might be of greater help to polity in general (of
>course, this is electoral campaign which, by definition, has narrow
>focus) by highlighting unequal/unjust ballot access procedures,
>state by s
7;battlegrounds')
It would be ironic if Cobb/LaMarche are on the Green Party ballots in
one-party states and Nader/Camejo are on the ballots in battleground
states.
--
Yoshie
* Critical Montages: <http://montages.blogspot.com/>
* Greens for Nader: <http://greensfornader.
upon request.
Therefore, this e-mail communication may be subject to public
disclosure.
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 08/08/04 5:03 PM >>>
Date: Sun, 08 Aug 2004 03:04:28 -0400
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Greens For Nader Update: Rigged Convention Divides Green Party
The nomination of
retry - first attempt seems to have been sent as attachment for some
reason, sorry... mh
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 08/08/04 5:03 PM >>>
Date: Sun, 08 Aug 2004 03:04:28 -0400
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Greens For Nader Update: Rigged Convention Divides Green Party
The nomina
Date: Sun, 08 Aug 2004 03:04:28 -0400
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Greens For Nader Update: Rigged Convention Divides Green Party
Greens For Nader Update: Rigged Convention Divides Green Party
2004.08.08 00:04:27
"Greens for Nader!" (circulating a petition to ""protest the campaign
against the voters by Democratic Party operatives trying to keep
Ralph Nader & Peter Miguel Camejo off the ballot"):
<http://montages.blogspot.com/2004/07/greens-for-nader.html>.
-
Tipped by a student column in the OSU student paper (Martha Knox,
"Voting for Nader won't hurt Gore's chances," _The Lantern_ 3
November 2000 at
<http://www.thelantern.com/archives/gendisp.asp?id=973258722515>), I
just visited "Yellow Dog Greens for Nader"
11 matches
Mail list logo
