Re: How Do "Off Budget" Items Affect Deficit?

1998-01-13 Thread Max B. Sawicky
> From: Doug Henwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Max B. Sawicky wrote: > > >Desposit insurance is a net revenue raiser now. > >The numbers for 1996 through 1999, respectively, > >are 8, 12, 4, 3, and 1 billion. For 2000 and after, > >the levels remain at $1 billion. > > Yeah, but the costs

Re: How Do "Off Budget" Items Affect Deficit?

1998-01-13 Thread Doug Henwood
Max B. Sawicky wrote: >Desposit insurance is a net revenue raiser now. >The numbers for 1996 through 1999, respectively, >are 8, 12, 4, 3, and 1 billion. For 2000 and after, >the levels remain at $1 billion. Yeah, but the costs of the S&L bailout are part of the debt service costs, no? I though

Re: How Do "Off Budget" Items Affect Deficit?

1998-01-13 Thread Max B. Sawicky
> From: Jay Hecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > If the S&L costs were counted as an "on line" current budget expenditure how > much greater would be the deficit? Desposit insurance is a net revenue raiser now. The numbers for 1996 through 1999, respectively, are 8, 12, 4, 3, and 1 billion. Fo

How Do "Off Budget" Items Affect Deficit?

1998-01-13 Thread Jay Hecht
Folks, If the S&L costs were counted as an "on line" current budget expenditure how much greater would be the deficit? Similarly, taking the Soc Sec surplus off the revenue side would imply a larger current budget deficit? Any estimates how large the 1997 deficit would be? Thanks Jason