http://www.levy.org/docs/pn/02-2.html
--
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA 95929
Tel. 530-898-5321
E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Michael Perelman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
==
For a complementary take:
http://www.brazil.ox.ac.uk/workingpapers/dePaula28.pdf
Expansion Strategies of European Banks to Brazil and their Impacts on the
Brazilian Banking Sector
The paper aims at
http://www.sbs.com.au/insight/insight_set.html
Now to the battle raging for the hearts and minds of Australian voters.
Today the Government and Opposition slugged it out, yet again, over tax. The
Opposition claimed the Government had a secret plan to increase the GST if
re-elected - a claim
Free marketeers putting on a poor show
By JAMES K. GALBRAITH *THE AGE*
Friday 27 July 2001
Adam Smith, the patron saint of free markets, had a
clear-eyed analysis of inequality. Servants, laborers and workmen of
different kinds, he wrote, make up the far greater part of
G'day all,
Yesterday, Australian Treasurer and Prime Minister-in-Waiting Peter Costello
gave a long and (inevitably) simplistic speech on the virtues and
inevitabilities of globalisation (I won't repeat it - you can pretty well
imagine it verbatim). Tonight Jamie Galbraith graced SBS TV's
proposals, simply because we did not know.
regards,
Alex
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rob Schaap
Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2001 7:09 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PEN-L:15556] Jamie Galbraith
G'day all,
Yesterday, Australian
Thanks for the reply, Alex.
Keynesian managed globalization -did such a thing ever existed?).
Well, Jamie called the quarter century after the War 'managed globalisation'
(or something very like it). I thought it an interesting characterisation,
too, but then, Keynes did talk to the Americans
Nobody intended for the tax cut to have a Keynesian
effect, even w/no spending cuts. If you're a
keynesian, it's too small ($40b this year) and
maldistributed. If you're not, its size is
irrelevant.
mbs
In any event, J. Galbraith is, IMO, right in stating that if behind a tax
cut there comes
Alex Izurieta wrote,
Less unlikely, but not highly probable either, would be a sort of
worldwide coordinated reflation.
But _given the alternatives_ doesn't the normal improbability of such a
response take on at least a more intense hue of possibility? The
institutional skeleton is there,
What about glomming onto Bob Greenstein CBBP, projections with that
program #er crunchin' gizmo he has?
Michael Pugliese
- Original Message -
From: Max Sawicky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2001 8:20 AM
Subject: [PEN-L:15563] RE: Jamie Galbraith
?
What about glomming onto Bob Greenstein CBBP, projections with that
program #er crunchin' gizmo he has?
Michael Pugliese
This short book review also touches on our discussion of the Pareto
distribution. It is readable, nontheless, for non-economists.
http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/books/2000/0009.galbraith.html
--
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA 95929
Tel.
ts exhibit "fat tails" (leptokurtosis), whatever one
attributes them to.
Barkley Rosser
-Original Message-
From: Michael Perelman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wednesday, August 23, 2000 10:56 AM
Subject: [PEN-L:741] Jamie Galbraith on Long Ter
, August 23, 2000 4:43 PM
Subject: [PEN-L:768] Re: Re: Jamie Galbraith on Long Term Capital Management
At 03:56 PM 8/23/00 -0400, you wrote:
Actually, I recently read something by Scholes where
he admitted the importance of the normal distribution
assumption and admitted that it does not hold
At 03:56 PM 8/23/00 -0400, you wrote:
Actually, I recently read something by Scholes where
he admitted the importance of the normal distribution
assumption and admitted that it does not hold.
was this before or after the Long-Term Capital Managment debacle?
Jim Devine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
15 matches
Mail list logo
