I got this from a person who came upon the invaluable pen-l archives and
saw that someone discussed Starr. He is suing Starr. I thought
that some of you might want to look at this, particularly writers who can
raise some more hell.
lpletten wrote:
Dear Michael Perelman:
Thank you. Tha
In a message dated 98-01-31 12:46:00 EST, you write:
<< Meanwhile Dick Morris blames Hillary's lesbianism.
Doug >>
donchaloveit He goes out and gets blow jobs because Hillary is
(ostensibly) eating pussy. Hmmm, I wonder if he actually thought the entire
scene through. Whatever else is
> Apologies to all you non-USers - and maybe a few USers too -
> who don't share the present obsession with Tailgate.
I'm heartily sick of even the New Zealand's press's obsession with
what local cartoonist, Garrick Tremaine, has labelled Fornigate.
Bill
/-
On Sat, 31 Jan 1998, James Heartfield wrote:
> Permanent scandal is getting to be the norm for the
> political process in most countries.
Yes, and I admit spending longer than usual watching the news because of
Clinton's latest, even though it seems to me on a bigger canvas it
should be apparant
In message , Doug Henwood
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>James Heartfield wrote:
>
>>Permanent scandal is getting to be the norm for the
>>political process in most countries.
>
>Replacing real politics, I suppose, a process the U.S. probably leads the
>world in.
I wrote this commentary for LM Onli
> >James Heartfield wrote:
> . . .
> In fact the descent into scandal has more to do with the failures of the
> right-wing opposition - in Britain and in America. Rather contesting the
> policies of Blair and Clinton, the right have latched onto sexual and
> other scandals to make up for their
James Heartfield wrote:
>Permanent scandal is getting to be the norm for the
>political process in most countries.
Replacing real politics, I suppose, a process the U.S. probably leads the
world in. I don't know about Britain, but what's struck me as this scandal
evolved over the last 10 days is
At 10:16 31/01/98 +, you wrote:
>In message , Doug Henwood
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>>Apologies to all you non-USers - and maybe a few USers too - who don't
>>share the present obsession with Tailgate.
>
>Don't apologise. The whole world waits with baited breath
Right. And in Bolivia
In message , Doug Henwood
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>Apologies to all you non-USers - and maybe a few USers too - who don't
>share the present obsession with Tailgate.
Don't apologise. The whole world waits with baited breath to see what
the President will come up with (if that's not too graphic
At 03:20 PM 1/30/98 EST, Maggie wrote:
>Sigh, I can't believe I mentally exchanged Lipinski for Lewinski -- brain
>damage -- too much pollution. Anyhow, Max, I agree, this may not have
been as
>planned as a conspiracy, but it is certainly moving in Clinton's direction.
>The 'bad boy' who the righ
In a message dated 98-01-30 10:17:09 EST, you write:
<< f Starr indicts the young Ms. Lewinsky, it won't
help him politically, and politics may be all that
matters in light of the dicey state of facts bearing
on legal proceedings.
>>
Sigh, I can't believe I mentally exchanged Lipinski for L
> From: Doug Henwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> . . .
> Concerning Maggie's suggestion that this is all a Billary plot to discredit
> Ken Starr - it may be attributing a bit too much PR skill to them to think
> they planned it, but the poll numbers seem to b
Apologies to all you non-USers - and maybe a few USers too - who don't
share the present obsession with Tailgate.
Concerning Maggie's suggestion that this is all a Billary plot to discredit
Ken Starr - it may be attributing a bit too much PR skill to them to think
they planned it, bu
13 matches
Mail list logo
