Louis,
For everything you say, I fail to see the true critique of participatory economics. Pining for the days of Paris Commune will not bring about revolution. Offering alternatives to the status quo will.
You also criticize Albert and Hahnel for their own criticisms of Trotsky's and Lenin's
troy cochrane wrote:
Louis,
For everything you say, I fail to see the true critique of participatory
economics. Pining for the days of Paris Commune will not bring about
revolution. Offering alternatives to the status quo will.
Did I appear to be pining for the Paris Commune? Actually I am much
critique of participatory economics. Pining for the
days of Paris Commune will not bring about
revolution. Offering alternatives to the status quo
will.
You also criticize Albert and Hahnel for their own
criticisms of Trotsky's and Lenin's support for
hierarchy, but you fail to defend
:
--
Michael Alberts Participatory Economics and the
problem of allocation
Michael Alberts whole proposal of Parecon
(Participatory Economics) suffers from what I believe
are serious and insurmountable defects, among which
the solution to the problem of allocation appears as
the decisive one. Albert
,
TroyLouis Proyect [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
troy cochrane wrote: Louis, For everything you say, I fail to see the true critique of participatory economics. Pining for the days of Paris Commune will not bring about revolution. Offering alternatives to the status quo will.Did I appear to be pining
e privacy ofpeople's choices -- it improperly politicizes allpreferences.jks--- troy cochrane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: Louis, For everything you say, I fail to see the true critique of participatory economics. Pining for the days of Paris Commune will not bring about revolution. Offering alte
for a class. We, thestudents, had a teleconference with Albert, in whichthe problem of allocation appeared as the criticalissue of his propposal. Here are my brief comments:--Michael Alberts Participatory Economics and theproblem of allocationMichael Alberts
Sure, I don't mind. Hahnel has a long criticism of a
longer statement of the views posted here years ago --
which he got second hand, and didn't forward to me,
just posted himself. You could probably find it
somewhere. jks
--- troy cochrane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andie,
Thanks for your
propposal. Here are my brief comments:
--
Michael Alberts Participatory Economics and the
problem of allocation
Michael Alberts whole proposal of Parecon
(Participatory Economics) suffers from what I
believe
are serious and insurmountable defects, among which
Justin wrote:
The second is that, even if AH had such an
alternative, their proposal does not strike me as
desirable because it would involve far too much of an
imposition on people's time, both in terms of
involvement in planning, and in terms of micromanaging
their working activity -- I
: Matías Scaglione [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:[PEN-L] Alberts Participatory Economics and the problem of
allocation
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I wrote a little comment on Michael Albert's Parecon
as a reading interrogation for a class. We, the
students, had
years?
TroyLouis Proyect [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Obviously, I'm a supporter of this alternative, but I'd like to hear any critiques from anyone on this list. If those on the list are supporters, I'd like to hear your thoughts or concerns. If there are those who are unaware of participatory
Troy Cochrane wrote:
I'm curious as to the opinion of those on this list of Participatory
Economics. It seems to be a well thought out, rationally presented, and
viable alternative to capitalism and state socialism.
I've made a detailed assessment of parecon in two articles that have
I'm curious as to the opinion of those on this list of Participatory Economics. It seems to be a well thought out, rationally presented, and viable alternative to capitalism and state socialism.
Several small businesses have been successfully operating for years on the model -obviously a limited
Obviously, I'm a supporter of this alternative, but I'd like to hear any
critiques from anyone on this list. If those on the list are supporters,
I'd like to hear your thoughts or concerns. If there are those who are
unaware of participatory economics -parecon, I'd be happy to post some
articles
Troy wrote: "I'd like to hear any critiques from anyone on this
list."
Here's a simple one: "ParEcon" -- This sounds
Stalinist/Sovietesque. For a program that seeks to transcend socialism's
equation with the USSR, this a rather bad thing.
On Tuesday, October 21, 2003 at 13:19:58 (-0700) Michael Dawson writes:
Troy wrote: I'd like to hear any critiques from anyone on this list.
Here's a simple one: ParEcon -- This sounds Stalinist/Sovietesque. For a program
that seeks to transcend socialism's equation with the USSR, this a
Troy Cochrane wrote:
I'm curious as to the opinion of those on this list of Participatory
Economics. It seems to be a well thought out, rationally presented, and
viable alternative to capitalism and state socialism.
I've made a detailed assessment of parecon in two articles that have
18 matches
Mail list logo
